← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3538/2011dismissedrule discharged

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (Msedcl), Through Its Executive Engineer v. M/S Balaji Ginning And Pressing Factory,Thr. Authorized Representative Shri Ashish S Chandrana And

2024-08-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare1 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:9812 1 wp 3538.11.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Writ Petition No.

of 20 [Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL), through its Executive Engineer(Rural), Akola ..vs.. M/s. Balaji Ginning & Pressing Factory through their authorized representative Shri Ashish S. Chandrana and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. V. Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.

DATED : 30-08 -2024 The petition was admitted to consider whether infrastructure cost, which was earlier levied for the purpose of giving electricity connections by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (M.S.E.D.C.L.), was permissible.

2.

It is stated that this issue was a subject matter in Civil Appeal No. 4305/2007 (Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission and another) before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which has been decided on 10/11/2016, by which the imposition of infrastructure cost has been quashed. 3.

In the light of above, the petitioner shall refund the infrastructure cost as received by them while granting application seeking electricity connection, if the cost is not already refunded.

4.

The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule stands discharged. No order as to costs.

(Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik