Bombay High CourtWP/3928/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Vikas S/O Babu Chavhan And 2 Others v. The Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli Through Its Chief Executive Officer And 3 Others

2015-09-15Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema2 pages

1509wp3928.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3928/2015 Vikas s/o Babu Chavhan and others ...Versus...

The Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, through its Chief Executive Officer and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Smt. Neeta Jog, Advocate for petitioners Shri W.G. Paunikar, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 Ms Tajwar Khan, AGP for respondent no.4 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 15.09.2015 By this petition, the petitioners, who are desirous of seeking promotion to the posts of Kendra Pramukh have sought direction to the Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli to consider the proposal of the petitioners for promotion to the posts of Kendra Pramukh.

The learned Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 has tendered a pursis in the Court today. It is stated in the pursis that as per the direction of the Director of Education (Primary), the respondent nos.1 and 2 are considering the proposal of all the primary teachers, eligible for promotion to the post of Kendra Pramukh, which includes the petitioners and the proposal would be decided within a reasonable time. It is stated that the proposal

1509wp3928.15.odt of the petitioners would be decided within a period of six weeks. Accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2, which will be binding on the respondent nos.1 and 2, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar