Pandurang Baru Borpe And Anothers v. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Department Of Mines, New Delhi And Others

51wp4252.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4252 of 2014 (Pandurang Baru Borpe and anr. vs. Union of India, through the Secretary, Deptt. of Mines, Govt. of India and Ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : 5th JANUARY, 2015.

Heard Mr.M.P.Kariya, learned Counsel for the petitioners.

It is apparent that the partition in the land acquired has been brought on revenue records after receipt of compensation from the respondents. On the basis of that partition, petitioner no.1 is claiming employment for his dependent. The pleadings in the petition show that when the land was acquired in 198990, there was no other male member in the family of petitioner no.1. Petitioner no.2 has been adopted subsequently and thereafter, present petition has been filed on 20.6.2014.

In this situation, the concession made available to the family whose land is acquired cannot be extended to the family of petitioner no.1. The petition is, therefore, misconceived and hence, the same is rejected.

jaiswal JUDGE JUDGE

51wp4252.14