Bombay High CourtWP/3808/2019disposedoff

Nagpur Housing And Area Development Board Through Its Chief Officer, Nagpur And Another v. Avinash Kailkar

2019-06-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp3808.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3808 OF 2019 (NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR...VS.. AVINASH KAILKAR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Archita M. Sudame, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri P.K. Bezalwar, Advocate for Respondent.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JUNE 25, 2019.

In this petition ad-interim order restraining the present petitioners from discontinuing the respondent/ employee on the ground of attaining the age of superannuation, is challenged.

The learned Advocates for the respective parties submit that hearing on application (Exh.U-2) is over and the matter is closed for orders on that application and it is fixed on 26th June 2019.

In these facts, I see no reason to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction to examine the legality of the adinterim order. The writ petition is disposed. No costs.

JUDGE RRaut..