Bombay High CourtWP/3352/1998dispossed offdismiss for default

Pradeep Son Of Vasant Deshpande v. The District Consumer And 2 Others

2015-10-14Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3352/1998 Pradeep son of Vasant Deshpande ...Versus...

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.R. Khamatkar, Adv. h/f Shri S.P. Kshirsagar, Adv. for petitioner Ms N.P. Mehta, AGP for respondent no.1 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 14.10.2015 Shri R.R. Khamatkar, the learned Counsel holding for Shri S.P. Kshirsagar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the cause for filing the writ petition must have been rendered infructuous due to passage of time considering the prayers made therein.

In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar