Bombay High CourtCAN/50/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Dr. Bharti Wd/O Ramesh Patil v. Central Council Of Indian Medicine, New Delhi Thr. Its Secretary And Others

2017-01-11Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

1 1101can50.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.50 OF 2016 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.83 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1265 OF 2015 (Dr. Bharti Ramesh Patil ..vs.. Central Council of Indian Medicine and another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. U.R. Tanna, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 11-01-2017.

By an order dated 06-05-2016, we had issued bailable warrant for the appearance of the respondents. It is stated on behalf of the applicants-respondents that on 27-06-2016, the applicants-respondents were present in the Court and the contempt petition was admitted. It is stated that the applicants-respondents were permitted to file additional affidavits and they would file the same within four weeks.

In the aforesaid set of facts, we grant the prayer made in the application. The applicants-respondents would, however, be required to remain present in this Court as and when the matter is fixed for final hearing.

2 1101can50.16 The civil application stands disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE adgokar