Bombay High CourtWP/3893/2019disposedoff

Prafulla Raghunath Malviya And Others v. Sau. Kalpana Premchand Gargele And Another

2019-06-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp3893.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3893 OF 2019 (PRAFULLA RAGHUNATH MALAVIYA & OTH..VS.. SAU. KALPANA PREMCHAND GARGELE & ANR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.R.Saboo, Advocate for Petitioners.

Shri C.H. Sharma, Advocate for Respondents.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JUNE 13, 2019.

Shri N.R. Saboo, Advocate for the petitioners states that the impugned order is appeallable under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure and seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appeal. Shri C.H. Sharma, Advocate for the respondents / caveators has no objection for withdrawal of the petition, however, opposed the prayer for grant of liberty contending that the appeal would not lie against the impugned order. Be that as it may, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy if available as per law.

JUDGE RRaut..