← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3812/2023disposedoff

M/S Linkhouse Industries Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Auth. Representative, Nandkumar Harchandani And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Revenue Minister, Revenue And Forest Dept., Mumbai And Another

2023-09-01Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke2 pages

2023:BHC-NAG:13104

(1) 4.wp.3812.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3812 OF 2023 M/s Linkhouse Industries Private Limited, through its authorised representative, Shri Nandkumar Harchandani and others Vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Revenue Minister, Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya Mumbai and another ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. D. V. Chauhan, Advocate for petitioner.

Ms. Kalyani Deshpande, AGP for respondent No.1/State. Mr. P. S. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :

URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATED : 01/09/2023 1.

The present respondent No.2 has preferred the Revision Application before the Revenue Minister, State of Maharashtra. While considering the revision, the Revenue Minister has issued an ex parte interim order, directing stay to the impugned order dated 10.08.2022 by which, the appeal of the present respondent No.2 was dismissed, which was challenging the mutation entry in favour of the present petitioners.

2.

Aggrieved by the interim order passed by the Revenue Minister, the present petition is preferred by the petitioners seeking setting aside of the said interim order as it was passed behind his back, ex parte.

3.

Respondent No.2 has filed his reply.

4.

Heard both sides. After perusal of the record, it reveals that it would be appropriate if the

(2) 4.wp.3812.2023 revision application filed by the present respondent No.2 before the Revenue Minister, is decided within three months. Accordingly, the Revenue Minister shall decide the said Revision Øekad & vihy & 2022@iz-Ø-181@t&8] within three months.

5.

The Revenue Minister shall decide the revision application within three months after giving sufficient opportunity to all the parties.

6.

The parties to appear before the Revenue Minister on 11.09.2023 at 11.00 a.m.

7.

With these directions, the petition is disposed of by keeping all issues open.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) Sarkate