Bombay High CourtWP/2421/2003dismissedrule discharged

Ku.Vijaya D/O Madhaorao Rajput v. State Of Maharashtra Thr.Secty.And 2 ORS.

2016-01-15Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

WP2421-03 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2421/2003 (VIJAYA MADHAORAO RAJPUT VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.N. Tapadia h/f Shri V.V. Bhangde, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Khubalkar, A.G.P. For the R-1, 2, 4 & 5. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 15 , 2016.

Learned counsel Shri S.N. Tapadia holding for Shri V.V. Bhangde, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that there are no instructions from the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not desirous of contesting the proceedings. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE