← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/399/2016allowed

Vinod Rajanna Narendulwar v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S. Rajura, Chandrapur

2016-07-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre1 pages

apl.399.16 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No.399 of 2016 (Vinod Rajanna Narendulwar vs.

State of Maharashtra, through P.S. Rajura, District Chandrapur) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.M. Deshpande, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 8 th JULY, 2016.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The learned Counsel for the applicant states that in compliance with the order passed by this Court on 20th June, 2016, the applicant has been regularly attending the Court dates and has been cooperating with the Court in expeditious disposal of the case.

There is no reason for me to accept the submission so made across the bar. Therefore, I am inclined to grant this application.

Accordingly, the application is allowed.

The impugned order dated 17/02/2016 is hereby quashed and set aside. The applicant shall be released on bail on the similar bail bonds as earlier subject to the condition that fresh bail bonds shall be executed and to the condition that the applicant shall regularly attend all the Court dates fixed from now onwards.

The application is disposed of.

JUDGE *sdw