Bombay High CourtWP/3365/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Maa Tulja Bhawani Macchimar Sahakari Sanstha. Veni Mahagaon Thr. Secretary Gamesh V Bagale v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Agriculture Mumbai And Others

2016-07-12Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

1207wp3365.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3365/2016 Maa Tulja Bhawani Macchimar Sahakari Sanstha, Veni, Tq. Mahagaon, Distt. Yavatmal, through its Secretary ...Versus...

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.M. Balpande, AGP for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 12.07.2016 By this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction against the respondents to extend the lease period pertaining to the fishing rights in the water reservoir of lower Pusad Project for a period of five years, as per the Government Policy.

Shri Balpande, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents states by referring to the order of the Regional Deputy Commissioner of Fisheries, Amravati Division, Amravati that the lease period is extended till 30.6.2021. It is stated that the grievance of the petitioner should stand redressed, in view of the said order.

1207wp3365.16.odt On a perusal of the order, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar