Vijay S/O Kashirao Mahajan v. Sou. Madhuri W/O Vijayrao Mahajan And ANR

FCA112-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 112/2014 (VIJAY KASHIRAO MAHAJAN VERSUS MADHURI VIJAYRAO MAHAJAN & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.A. Kalbande, counsel for the petitioner. Shri H.N. Bhongade, counsel for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 10 , 2015.

The learned counsel for the parties have tendered a compromise pursis in the Court, today. The same is accepted on record.

It is stated in the compromise pursis that since the respondent no.1 has remarried on 13.04.2012 during the pendency of this appeal, the appellant is not desirous of pressing the appeal against the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court. It is stated in the pursis that the parties are withdrawing the allegations levelled against each other. It is further stated that the appellant would pay a sum of Rupees Five Thousand per month to respondent no.2-Bhumika towards maintenance till she attains the age of majority. The appellant agrees to give a suitable gift to respondent no.2-Bhumika and also some monetary help as per his desire and status at the time of her marriage. The compromise pursis is signed by the appellant and the respondent no.1 and the counsel for the appellant and the respondents. The parties are present in the Court, today. They state that they are ad-idem on the terms mentioned in the compromise pursis. The appellant has agreed that if respondent no.2-Bhumika is not able to maintain herself after attaining the age of majority, she would be entitled to file

FCA112-14 appropriate proceedings for monthly maintenance till she is able to maintain herself or is married.

We have read the terms of the compromise pursis. They are just and reasonable. Hence, we dispose of the Family Court Appeal on the terms mentioned in the compromise pursis. A decree be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE