← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/171/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Dr. Madan Krishnarao Bodkhe v. Shri Sanjay Chahande, The Principal Secretary, Higher And Technical Education Deptt., And Another

2015-08-07Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar2 pages

Order 0708cp171.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 171/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3884/2014.

Dr. madan Krishnarao Bodkhe -VERSUSShri Sanjay Chahande and another.

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri A.I. Sheikh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A.S.Fulzele, Addl. G.P. for the Respondents.

CORAM

: SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 07, 2015.

By this Contempt Petition, the petitioner seeks action against the respondents for the willful disobedience of the order dated 10.02.2015 in Writ Petition No. 3884/2014.

According to the petitioner, though this Court had by the judgment dated 10.02.2015 in Writ Petition No.3884/2014, directed the respondents to compute the amount payable to the petitioner, in accordance with the judgment of the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court and release the amount within a period of two months, the respondents have not released the amount within the stipulated period.

Order 0708cp171.15 Shri Fulzele, the learned Addl.

Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has tendered an affidavit on behalf of the respondent no.2 in the Court today. The same is accepted on record. It is stated in the affidavit, that after verification of the proposal forwarded by the Principal of the College, the respondents have released the amount due and payable to the petitioner, to the College on 05.08.2015. It is stated that the College has paid the amount to the petitioner on 05.08.2015. Certain documents are annexed with the affidavit to substantiate the facts stated in the affidavit. On a perusal of the affidavit-in-reply and also the documents annexed thereto, it appears that the respondents have complied with the order and it would therefore, not be necessary to continue the contempt proceedings against the respondents any longer.

In view of the aforesaid, the Contempt Petition is disposed of, with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.