Bombay High CourtWP/3425/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Amit S/O Purushottam Ingle v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department Of Tribal Development, Mumbai And Another

2016-07-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

WP3425-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3425/2016 (AMIT PURUSHOTTAM INGLE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.K. Mohta, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri V.P. Maldhure, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : JULY 05 , 2016.

The only prayer made by the petitioner is for a direction against the Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner, within a time frame.

Shri Maldhure, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Scrutiny Committee, states on instructions that the caste claim of the petitioner is pending and the same would be decided as early as possible.

In view of the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner as early as possible and positively within a period of one year from the date of appearance of the petitioner before the Scrutiny Committee. The petitioner undertakes to appear before the Scrutiny Committee on 26.07.2016.

Order accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE