Bombay High CourtWP/5832/2016withdrawn

Shri Asaram S/O Tukaram Nandanwar And 3 Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Nagpur And 3 Others

2016-12-13Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 wp5832.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5832 OF 2016 [Shri Asaram s/o Tukaram Nandanwar and others .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.V. Muley, Advocate for the petitioners, Shri A.M. Joshi, AGP for respondent no.1, Smt. Aparna Borkute, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 4. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 13, 2016.

This court was not inclined to entertain the writ petition so as to decide a dispute in regard to the title and possession vis-a-vis the petitioners and the person who is not joined as a party to this writ petition.

The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that in view of the statement made in the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3, the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the same. Permission is granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA