← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3156/2009dismissedrule discharged

Ravishekhar S/O Shankarrao Guralwar v. Mah. State Of Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. Thr. M.D. And ANR

2017-01-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3156/2009 Ravishekhar s/o Shankarrao Guralwar ...Versus...

Maharashtra State of Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd., through its Managing Director, Mumbai and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Vaidya, Adv. h/f Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for petitioner Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for respondent no.1 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 25.01.2017 Shri Vaidya, the learned Counsel holding for Shri Parchure, the learned Counsel for the petitioner has tendered a pursis in the Court today. It is stated in the pursis that the Counsel has not received any instructions from the petitioner, despite the efforts. It is stated that it would be difficult to conduct the matter without any instructions.

In view of the statements made in the pursis, we dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar