← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPR/122/2025disposed off

M/S Holum Iron And Steel Com. Ltd. Thr. Its Director Deepak Babulal Mehta v. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Thr. Its Divisional Manager

2025-06-11Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke3 pages

1 951 APPR 121.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 121/2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.243/2022 (M/s. Holumn Iron & Steel Co. Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation) with CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 123/2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.244/2022 (M/s. Holumn Iron & Steel Co. Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation) with CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 124/2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.245/2022 (M/s. Holumn Iron & Steel Co. Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation) with CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 125/2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.246/2022 (M/s. Holumn Iron & Steel Co. Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation) with CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 122/2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.

242/2022 (M/s. Holumn Iron & Steel Co. Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.S. Sohoni, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. V.Mishra, Advocate for respondent (applicant) CORAM: URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATED : 11/06/2025.

Heard.

1.

Affidavits filed by the deponent i.e. Director of the applicant/Company are taken on record.

2.

All these applications are filed by the respondent/applicant in the present criminal revisions applications for seeking permission of the withdrawal of the amount which is deposited by the applicant in this Court as well as before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-12,

2 951 APPR 121.25 Nagpur .

3.

All the revisions applications filed are challenging the order of conviction passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class and confirmed by the Revisional Court i.e. Additional Sessions Judge-12, Nagpur. During the pendency of these revisions, the matters were referred to the Mediator for mediation, which were settled. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he has already complied with the terms and conditions of the settlement and he has also furnished the affidavit of the compliance. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that as the matter is amicably settled between the parties and the amount are lying in this Court as well as before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-12, Nagpur therefore, he be permitted to withdraw the said amount.

4.

In view of settlement, the respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount on due identification and verification before the office. The respondent shall file appropriate application for withdrawal of the amount which is deposited in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-12, Nagpur and learned Sessions Judge shall consider the application and pass appropriate orders permitting to withdraw the amount to the respondent.

5.

All the applications are disposed of.

6.

The respondent be permitted to withdraw the amount in view of settlement along with accrued interest thereon.

3 951 APPR 121.25 7.

All the revisions applications being amicably settled between the parties, are disposed of.

8.

In view of the settlement between the parties, the applicant is acquitted from the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. ( URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE , J.) Gohane