← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/13/2020ca disposed off

Tikaram S/O Tulshiram Rathod Thr. P.O.A. Shriram T. Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Yavatmal And Others

2025-01-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar Chandrabhan More2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:290

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CAF NO.13 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL ST NO.11547 OF 2019D TIKARAM S/O TULSHIRAM RATHOD THR. P.O.A. SHRIRAM T. RATHOD VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

Mr. D.G. Patil, Advocate for the appellant/s Mr. A.M. Kukday, Advocate for the respondent No.3 Mr. M.A. Kadu, AGP for the respondent/State -------------------------------

CORAM

: SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 10 th January, 2025 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant-claimant is seeking condonation of delay of 642 days in filing appeal against the judgment and award dated 13.04.2017 passed by the learned Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case (LAC) No.52 of 2010.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondent No.3/ acquiring body and the ld AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground of inordinate delay. However, considering the statutory rights of the applicant, the delay of 642 days stands condoned, subject to cost of Rs.1000/- to be deposited with the Registry of this Court for utilization of dispensary of this Court, within two weeks. 4.

The appeal be registered after deposit of cost nd.thawre

and removal of all the objections, if any.

5.

It is made clear that the applicant/claimant shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the aforesaid period of delay.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) nd.thawre