Bombay High CourtCP/123/2017dispossed offdismiss for default

Vijaykumar S/O Tarachand Agrawal v. Ashok S/O Narayanlal Agrawal And Another

2018-01-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 cp123.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 123 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2038 OF 2016 (P) (VIJAYKUMAR TARACHAND AGRAWAL...VS.. ASHOK NARAYANLAL AGRAWAL & ANR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.A.Mohta, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri Amit Bhate, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JANUARY 10, 2018.

The learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to delete name of the respondent No.2. Permission granted.

Heard.

Considering the explanation given by the respondent No.1 in the affidavit sworn by him on 14th December, 2017 and accepting the undertaking given by the respondent No.1 that he will co-operate in disposal of the civil suit as per the directions given by this Court, I do not think it appropriate to initiate the proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondent.

The notice issued to the respondent No.1 is discharged. The contempt petition is disposed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs. JUDGE RRaut..