Bombay High CourtWP/3883/2008dispossed offdismiss for default

Namdeo Tukaram Gabhane v. Adarsh Mahila Mandal,Thr Its President And 5 ORS.

2018-08-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp3883.08

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3883/2008 Namdeo Tukaram Gabhane ..Vs..

Adarsh Mahila Mandal, Bhandara and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri N.R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.3.

CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATED : 27.8.2019.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner / employee states that in view of subsequent events the petitioner does not want to prosecute the petition and seeks permission to withdraw the petition. It is disposed accordingly. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE Tambaskar.