Bombay High CourtWP/3080/2018disposedoff

Miss. Leena D/O Vinayakrao Khadatkar @ Sau. Leena Pankaj Pawar v. State Of Maharashtra Through Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation Project, Nagpur

2018-06-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp3080.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3080/2018 Miss. Leena D/o Vinayakrao Khadatkar @ Sau. Leena Pankaj Pawar ..Vs..

State of Maharashtra, through Superintendent Engineer, Irrigation Project, Nagpur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. M.N. Hiwase, Advocate for petitioner.

Shri P.S. Tembhare, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ. DATED : 26.6.2018.

Petitioner is state government employee and there is no challenge to any proceedings before Scrutiny Committee. The Scrutiny Committee is also not party. Petitioner, therefore, has to make grievance of this type as per Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act. Hence, with liberty to petitioner to approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal and keeping all contentions open, we dispose of writ petition. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.