← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3432/2011dismissedrule discharged

Dhanraj S/O Wasudeorao Khade v. The Union Of India Thr. Its Secty., And ORS

2017-02-24Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3432/2011 Dhanraj s/o Wasudeorao Khade ...Versus...

The Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development Department, New Delhi and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Hemlata Jaipurkar, AGP for respondent nos.3 and 5 Shri Abhay Sambre, Advocate for respondent no.7 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 24.02.2017 Earlier Ms T.H. Udeshi was appearing for the petitioner as his Counsel. Since the learned Counsel is appointed as an Assistant Government Pleader, it is stated that the brief was returned by her to the petitioner. Despite the fact that the brief is returned to the petitioner, the petitioner has not made any other arrangement.

None appears for the petitioner today. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar