Sau. Yamubai W/O Uddhao Padole v. Vinayak S/O Ramkrishna Hume And ANR

mca972-14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC. C.A. No.972 OF 2014 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 374 OF 2013 Sau. Yamubai wd/o Uddhao Padole Vs.

Vinayak s/o Ramkrishna hume and another.

........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri N.S.Tamale, Advocate for applicant.

Shri Mishra, counsel for respondent.

CORAM: A. S. CHANDURKAR J.

DATED: 20th FEBRUARY, 2015.

Prayer is to restore the second appeal that was dismissed for want of prosecution. Application is opposed by the learned counsel for respondent no. 1 on the ground that no sufficient reason is assigned.

Considering the reasons stated and the fact that the application is supported by affidavit of learned counsel for the applicant, the application is allowed. Order dated 27.6.2014 is set aside. Second appeal is restored to file. M.C.A. Is disposed of.

JUDGE Hirekhan