Bombay High CourtSA/419/2018disposed off as a withdrawn

Ashok S/O Vithoba Ukey v. Bansilal S/O Ruda Fating

2022-02-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar1 pages

1 15 sa 419-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.419 OF 2018 Ashok S/o Vithoba Ukey ..vs..

Bansilal S/o Ruda Fating - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.T. Anthony, Advocate for appellant CORAM :

SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.

DATED :

25/02/ The learned Counsel for the appellant placed a pursis no.03/2022 on record to the effect that legal representatives of decree holder are not pressing for specific performance and want to withdraw the amount deposited by the appellant. In view of it, appellant do not want to proceed with the Second Appeal and wants to withdraw the same.

Appellant in person is present, identified by his Counsel.

Permission is granted as prayed for. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

JUDGE Jayashree.....

Signed By:JAYASHREE SHARAD SHINGNE