← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3123/2020disposed off

M/S Ranganatha Construction Through Prop. Shri. Amarnath S/O Ranga Reddy v. M/S Rajyog Construction Co. Through Proprietor Valay Ramesh Pise

2022-02-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. A. Sanap1 pages

29-WP-3123-20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3123 OF 2020 M/S RANGANATHA CONSTRUCTION THROUGH ITS PROP. SHRI AMARNATH S/O RANGA REDDY

VERSUS

,M/S RAJYOG CONSTRUCTION CO. THROUGH IT'

S PROPRIETOR VALAY RAMESH PISE AND OTHERS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V. D. Darne, Advocate for petitioner.

CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J.

DATE :

09/02/2022.

Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner at length.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly stated that there is no privity of contract between the petitioner and the respondent No.2. It is submitted that the privity of contract is between the petitioner and respondent No.1. When the Court expressed its opinion on the merits of the matter, learned Advocate for the petitioner made a request for withdrawal of the petition. The petition, therefore, stands disposed of and dismissed being withdrawn. It is made clear that in view of his prayer for withdrawal, this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter.

(JUDGE) Choulwar VITHAL MAROTRAO CHOULWAR VITHAL MAROTRAO CHOULWAR Date: 2022.02.09 17:45:51 +0530