Bombay High CourtCP/123/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Dr. Anil Ramchandra Vyawahare (Dead) Through His Lrs. Devendra Anil Vyawahare And Others v. Sahariya J.S. / Secretary, Department Of Education And Employment, Mumbai And Others

2015-09-02Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema2 pages

0209cp123.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.123/2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4263/2011 (D) AND WRIT PETITION NO.4813/2011 (D) Dr. Anil Ramchandra Vyawahare since dead through his L.Rs. Devendra Anil Vyawahare and others ...Versus...

Ashwini Bhide, Secretary, Department of Education and Employment, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for petitioners Shri D.M. Kale, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 5 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 02.09.2015 By this contempt petition, the petitioners seek an action against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 22.2.2012 in Writ Petition Nos.4263/2011 and 4813/2011.

Shri Kale, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the amount due and payable to the petitioner nos.1 to 9 and 11 has been paid to the petitioners and since the petitioner no.10 has expired during the pendency of the petition, the amount due and payable to the petitioner no.10 is paid to the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner no.10.

0209cp123.14.odt Shri Anand Parchure, the learned Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that the petitioner nos.1 to 9 and 11 have been paid their dues.

In view of the aforesaid, by accepting the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, we dispose of the contempt petition with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar