Harichandra S/O Mahadeo Meshram v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai And ORS

Judgment 945.wp.4477.2022judg.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO.4477 OF 2022 Harichandra S/o. Mahadeo Meshram, Aged 56 Yrs., Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Vedant Nagar, Manora Road, Karanja Lad, Dist. Washim.

District Gondia .... PETITIONER // VERSUS // 1.

State of Maharashtra, Through its secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 2.

Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Karanja Lad, Dist. Washim 3.

Sub-Divisional Officer,, Karanja Lad, Dist. Washim 4.

Gajanan S/o. Nana Gadhwale, Aged Adult, Occu.: Business, R/o. Tushar Colony, Near Government Rest House, Karanja Lad, Dist. Washim .... RESPONDENTS ___________________________________________________________________ Mr T. U. Tathod, Advocate for petitioner Mr P. P. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No. 2 Ms Ketki Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.1 & 3 __________________________________________________________________ CORAM :

SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND G. A. SANAP , J J .

DATED : 28.09.2022 ORAL JUDGMENT :

(PER :

SUNIL B. SHUKRE , J.) 1] Heard.

Judgment 945.wp.4477.2022judg.odt 2] Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, presses only prayer clause (ii) and does not press other prayer clauses. 3] Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4] Respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 06.06.2022, in accordance with law and after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks from the date of appearance of the petitioner before respondent No.2. The petitioner may appear before respondent No. 2 on 10.10.2022.

5] Rule accordingly.

(G. A. SANAP, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Kavita Signed By:KAVITA PRAVIN TAYADE P. A.