Rajendra S/O Vithalrao Prakashe And Another v. Nitin Annaji Raut And Others

(1) 61wp4095.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4095 OF 2022 Rajendra Vithalrao Prakashe and anr__ Vs. ___Nitin Annaji Raut and ors --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for petitioners Mr. Amol Raut, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 Mrs. M.M.Barabde, AGP for Respondent No.4 [ CORAM :

AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 11/10/2022 1] Heard Mr. Rohit Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2] The controversy in the present case is already considered by me in W.P. No.5570 of 2022, decided on 21.9.2022 by holding that in a scheme application under Section 50A of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, it is only the trustee who has a right to be heard. The position in the instant matter is the same, considering which the impugned order dt 27.05.2022 which permits the respondent to intervene is hereby quashed and set aside and the application for intervention at Exh. 23 is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rvjalit Digitally sign byRAJESH VASANTRAO JALIT Location: