← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4081/2024dismissed

Shri. Purushottam Mahadeo Bhagat (Died), Thr. His Lrs. v. Nitin Manikchand Sahare

2024-08-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:10427 955-wp-4081-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition (WP) No. 4081 of 2024 Shri Purushottam Mahadeo Bhagat (Died) through his legal representatives

Versus

Nitin Manikchand Sahare Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri V.M.Nitnaware, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Vaishali Manwatkar, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J.

DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2024.

This petition takes exception to the order dated 2nd September, 2023 passed by the learned District Judge-15, Nagpur in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 109 of 2023.

2.

In a suit filed by the respondent herein for eviction and possession of the suit premises, the learned trial Court by order dated 25th January, 2023, directed the petitioner herein to deposit the arrears of rent to the tune of Rs.2,65,000/- for the period from June 2018 to SKNair

955-wp-4081-24.odt November, 2022 and to deposit the rent at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month from February, 2023.

3.

By the impugned order, the learned appellate court has dismissed the appeal filed by the present petitioner against the order of the learned trial Court.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in absence of any rent agreement or landlord-tenant relationship the order passed by the learned trial Court is without jurisdiction. It is submitted that even otherwise, the suit is bad for nonissuance of notice under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

5.

The petitioner has not spelled out in what capacity he is occupying the suit premises. I am therefore not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is dismissed.

[N.R.BORKAR, J.] SKNair