Bombay High CourtWP/2195/1998dispossed offdismiss for default

Nalini Prakash Ambagade And Another v. District Rehabilitation Officer And Another

2015-01-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.P. Bhangale1 pages

2201wp2195.98.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2195/1998 Sou. Nalini Prakash Ambagade and another ...Versus...

District Rehabilitation Officer, Nagpur and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Chitale, Advocate for petitioners Shri N.S. Khubalkar, AGP for respondents - State CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : 22.01.2015 P.C.

The learned Counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions, states that the petitioners have already crossed the age of recruitment and have already secured another employment. He, therefore, submits that due to passage of time challenge is rendered infructuous.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. Rule is discharged. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar