← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/203/2019dismissedrule discharged

Sanjay S/O Sarjerao Pawar v. Vandana Krishna, Secretary, The State Of Maha. Education And Sports Department, Mumbai And Others

2019-09-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

3009cp203.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.203/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8024/2018 Sanjay s/o Sarjerao Pawar ...Versus...

Vandana Krishna, Secretary, The State of Maharashtra, Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Counsel for petitioner Mrs. B.P. Maldhure, Counsel for respondent no.2 Shri V.S. Dhobe, Counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4 CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 30/09/2019 1.

Heard.

2.

From the reply filed on behalf of the respondent no.2, it is seen that after passing of the order by this Court on 27/02/2019 the respondent no.2 sanctioned the bills submitted to him and even released the salary. 3.

The release of the salary is not in dispute and what is in dispute is that the salary has been released only on the basis of 25% grant-in aid and not 100% grant-in aid extended to Kalpataru Shikshan Samajik and Sanskrutik Sanstha. But

3009cp203.19.odt there is no order passed by this Court saying a particular amount of salary to be paid to the petitioner. The dispute is about as to which salary would be payable to the petitioner and that issue is yet to be decided. Therefore, we find no substance in this contempt petition. The contempt petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar, P.S.