Bombay High CourtWP/4847/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Khubchand S/O. Oza Belwanshi v. Western Coalfields Limited, Saoner, Through Its Superintendent / Manager And Others

2016-02-26Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

1/1 wp4847.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 4847 OF 2015 Khubchand S/o Oza Belwanshi -vsWestern Coalfields Ltd., Saoner, Dist. Nagpur thr.its Superintendent (Mines)/Manager &others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. M.R.Sakharkar, counsel h/f Mr. D.S.Thakur, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R. Darda, counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : 26.02.2016.

By this petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondents to comply with the office orders dated 12/09/1998 and 14/09/1998 in respect of the protection of the post, category and pay scale of the petitioner.

When we heard the counsel for the petitioner on 14/09/2015, we did not find any merit in the grounds raised in the petition for seeking the aforesaid prayer. It was, however, canvassed on behalf of the petitioner that the office order dated 15/09/2014 would apply to the case of the petitioner and the petitioner could be granted the benefit in accordance with the same. We, therefore, issued a notice to the respondents on he limited issue, as stated herein above. Shri Darda, the learned counsel for the respondents on instructions, states that the petitioner would be granted relief as per the office order dated 15/09/2014 as the same is being granted to the employees in phases.

By accepting the statement made by the learned counsel on behalf of the respondents which would be binding on the respondents, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE