Chhotubhai S/O Gopalbhai Patel (Dead) And Others v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai Through Its Executive Engineer, Chandrapur
1 22.cao.636.2022
IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 636 OF 2022 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.10655 OF 2021 IN CROSS-OBJECTION ST. NO. 12353 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.309 OF 2012 Chhotubhai s/o Gopalbhai Patel and ors.
..vs..
Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mohit P. Khajanchi, Advocate for the cross-objector. Shri Futane, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 19/09/2025.
Heard.
2.
By this application, the applicant/cross-objectors are seeking condonation of 2588 days delay in filing the restoration application of cross-objection, which was rejected due to non-removal of office objection.
3.
Hence, considering the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application is disposed of accordingly.
Misc. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. No.10655 of 2021 4.
Heard.
5.
By this application, the applicant/cross-objectors are seeking restoration of cross-objection, which the registration was rejected.
6.
For the reason stated in the application, the application is allowed and disposed of.
7.
Registry is directed to restore the cross-objection. 8.
Learned Counsel for the applicants/cross-objector
2 22.cao.636.2022 undertakes to remove office objection within a period of two weeks.
9.
List the matter immediately after removal of office objection.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL , J.
) Trupti