Bombay High CourtWP/4281/2017dismissedrule discharged

Haridas S/O Shrikrishnadas Bhattad v. Raju S/O Vidyadhar Tikle And Another

2019-06-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp4281.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4281/2017 Haridas S/o Shrikrishnadas Bhattad ..Vs..

Raju S/o Vidyadhar Tikle and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATED : 25.6.2019.

Heard.

The original plaintiff has challenged the orders passed by the trial Court refusing to condone delay in filing the application for bringing legal representatives of defendant No.1 on record and consequently, rejecting the application seeking permission to bring legal representatives of defendant No.1 on record. In this petition, the proposed legal representatives of defendant No.1 are not impleaded. Hence, in my view, it would not be proper to consider the grievance of the petitioner / original plaintiff at the back of the proposed legal representatives of defendant No.1. Hence, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file proper petition, if so advised. No costs.

JUDGE Tambaskar.