← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4257/2019dispossed offdismiss for default

Sau. Sunita Dilip Chuke v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Minister For Rural Development, Mumbai And Others

2020-09-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale1 pages

1 / 1 07-WP 4257.2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4257 OF 2019 Sau. Sunita Dilip Chuke vs.

The State of Maharashtra and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, Court' s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri. S. M. Vaishnav, counsel for the petitioner. Shri. A. M. Kadukar, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. S. A. Mohta, counsel for respondent No.3. Shri. M. R. Joharapurkar, counsel for respondent Nos.5 & 6. CORAM : MANISH PITALE J.

DATED : 14/09/2020 Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that with passage of time the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

3.

Hence, disposed of as infructuous.

4.

The order be communicated to the counsel appearing for the parties, either on the email address or on WhatsApp or by such other mode, as is permissible in law.

JUDGE KOLHE/P.A.