Purushottam Maroti Chiravatkar v. The Collector, Bhandara And Others

2025:BHC-NAG:913-DB 1 18.wp.4436.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4436/2019 Purushottam Maroti Chiravatkar Vs.

The Collector, Bhandara and Ors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P. S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2/State. Ms A.S. Athalye, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 28/01/2025.

.

In view of pursis dated 28.01.2025 placed on record by the learned Counsel for the respondent No.4 along with the Award dated 18.11.2024 and the fact about depositing the amount of the compensation with the Land Acquisition Officer, nothing survives in the petition, the same stands disposed of.

2.

However, in case, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded, he is at liberty to take recourse to such remedy as is permissible in law. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule