← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPR/114/2021dismissed

Rajendra Namdevrao Ghaddinkar v. Sau Sangita Rajendra Ghaddinkar

2021-09-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo2 pages

appr114.21.O.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.114 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (REVN) NO.171 OF 2019 (Rajendra Nadevrao Ghaddinkar Vs. Sau. Sangita Rajendra Ghaddinkar and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. K. N. Jain, Advocate h/f Mr. S. S. Dhengale, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Pranav Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr. K. P. Mahalle, Advocate for Respondent 1.

CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE: 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2021.

The applicant - husband is seeking to amend the revision and is further seeking permission to place certain documents on record. It is not in dispute that the documents which are now sought to be placed on record, and that too in revision, were not placed on record either before the Family Court or then before the Appellate Court which decided the appeal under section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). The proposed amendment seeks to introduce certain pleadings which are absolutely new and different from the original pleadings and I am not inclined, in revisional jurisdiction to permit the applicant - husband to place on record additional documents particularly since there is absolutely no explanation forthcoming why the documents could not be placed on record in the Family Court or then in

appr114.21.O.odt the Appellate Court.

2.

The application is dismissed.

JUDGE NSN