← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1137/2016admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Gramin Va Sahakari Vikas Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Through Secretary, Dr. Madhukar Y. Jadhav v. Union Of India Human Resources Deptt., Through Its Secty., New Delhi And 4 Others

2017-08-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao Giratkar1 pages

CAO1137-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.1137/2016 IN MCA ST. NO.12881/2016 IN M.C.A. NO.480/2016 (D) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3536/2015 (D) (GRAMIN VA SAHAKARI VIKAS BAHU-UDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, PUSAD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Rucha Pande, Advocate h/f Shri M.A. Vaishnav, counsel for the applicant.

Mrs. M.M. Munshi, counsel for the R-5.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND M.G. GIRATKAR, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 09 , 2017.

Heard.

Though the learned counsel for the non-applicant no.5 opposes the prayer made in the application, the delay of 26 days in filing the restoration application is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. ST. NO.12881/2016.

Heard. Perused the contents of the application. For the reasons stated in the application, the writ petition is restored to file subject to payment of costs of Rupees Five Hundred to the High Court Bar Association, Nagpur within one week.

The miscellaneous civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE