← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3239/2018admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Ku. Panchfula Mansaram Uparwat (After Marriage Sau. Panchfula Mukinda Tayade) v. State Of Maha. Thr. Secr. Department Of Tribal Welfare And Development, Mumbai And Others

2018-07-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp3239.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3239/2018 Ku. Panchfula Mansaram Uparwat (after marriage Sau. Panchfula Mukinda Tayade) ..Vs..

The State of Maharashtra and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ. DATED : 27.7.2018.

1.

Against the same respondent - Scrutiny Committee, Akola this Court has decided identical 74 challenges. The parties state that controversy is covered by said judgment delivered on 16th July, 2018 in Writ Petition No.3143/2018 and other identical matters. 2.

Hence, for same reasons with similar directions and conditions, we allow this writ petition also.

3.

Petitioner shall appear before Scrutiny Committee on 28th August, 2018 and abide it's by further instructions in the matters.

JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.