Bombay High CourtWP/6110/2016ca disposed off

Sau. Vaishali W/O. Gajanan Khadse v. Gajanan S/O Narayan Khadse

2017-03-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp6110.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6110 OF 2016 (SAU. VAISHALI GAJANAN KHADSE....VS.. GAJANAN NARAYAN KHADSE.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S. Raisuddin, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri M.I. Dhatrak, Advocate for Respondent.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : MARCH 02, 2017.

Shri M.I. Dhatrak, advocate appearing for the respondent/ husband states that Regular Civil Appeal No. 78 of 2014 in which interim order, which is challenged in this petition was passed, is disposed and therefore, the petition has become infructuous.

Shri S.Raisuddin, advocate for the petitioner/wife states that he is not having any instructions in this regard. Accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent, the petition is disposed as infructuous. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE Rraut..