← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6006/2022disposed off

Shri. Sagar S/O Sheshrao Bhanavat v. Shri. Vinod S/O. Ramdas Chavhan

2024-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:14151 1 wp 6006.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.6006/2022 Sagar V Vinod ------------------------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------------- Mr. N.S. Bhattad, Advocate for petitioner.

Mrs Varsha Wasu (Dhoble), Advocate for respondent. CORAM : N.R. Borkar, J.

DATE : 12-12-2024.

This petition takes exception to the order dated 11-04-2022 passed by the learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal below Exhibit-82 in Special Civil Suit No.55/2010.

ii.

Respondent herein has filed a suit for possession of suit property against the present petitioner. iii.

By the order impugned, the learned trial Court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner for seeking permission to further cross examine the respondent. iv.

The permission to further cross-examine respondent was sought in view of the framing of additional issues. It is not in dispute that additional issues were framed after the evidence of respondent was over. The learned trial Court therefore ought to have granted the opportunity to the petitioner as sought. The

2 wp 6006.22.odt order impugned is set aside. The learned trial Court shall recall the respondent and shall permit the petitioner to further crossexamine him qua the additional issues. v.

Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (N.R. Borkar, J. ) Deshmukh