Bombay High CourtWP/2496/2003dispossed offdismiss for default

Sukhdeo Uttam Neware v. State Of Maharashtra Thr.Its Secty. And 2 ORS

2015-03-26Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

WP2496-03 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2496/2003 (SUKHDEO UTTAM NEWARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.M. Ghodeswar, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri A.L. Deshpande, counsel for the R-2.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 26 , 2015.

Since none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, a notice was issued to the petitioner for engagement of another counsel. The notice is duly served on the petitioner. However, the petitioner has not proceeded to engage a counsel and prosecute the writ petition.

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE