← Library
Bombay High CourtREVN/198/2022dismissed

Arun Sugdeo Jadhao v. Varsha Arun Jadhao And 2 Others

2022-10-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

87-revn-198-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Revision (REVN) No. 198 of 2022 Arun Sugdeo Jadhao

Versus

Varsha Arun Jadhao and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri S.U.Bhuyar, Advocate for the applicant.

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED : 12th OCTOBER, 2022.

The challenge is raised to the judgment and order dated 24th March, 2022 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Buldhana in petition no. E-124 of 2021 allowing the petition under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of maintenance and thereby application is directed to pay Rs.4000/- per month to the wife Varsha, Rs.2000/- to the son Vivek and Rs.1000/- to the daughter Ku. Arya from the date of filing of petition.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the salary certificate filed on record shows that the applicant receives Rs.9608/-. Whereas, the learned trial Court has granted maintenance to the tune of Rs.7,000/- in total to the wife and children. He SKNair

87-revn-198-22.odt therefore, submits that the amount of maintenance is exorbitant.

3.

Learned Judge of Family Court while passing the impugned judgment and order has held that gross salary of the applicant was Rs.32,941/- in the month of June 2017. He further admitted it in his cross-examination that his salary is more than Rs.30,000/-.

4.

The son of the applicant is in 10th Standard and considering the expenses for education and cost of living and inflation, the learned Judge of Family Court has granted maintenance of Rs.7000/- to the respondents i.e. wife and two children.

5.

Considering the findings recorded by the learned Family Court, I am of the opinion that no perversity has been committed by the Family Court in granting maintenance of Rs.4,000/- to the wife, Rs.2000/- to the son and Rs.1000/- to the daughter of the applicant.

6.

In the circumstance, I do not find any merit in the present revision application. Accordingly, I pass the following order.

i.

Criminal revision is dismissed.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] by SACHINDANAND K NAIR Date: 2022.10.14 14:48:06 +0530 SACHINDANAND K NAIR SKNair