M/S Bharti Foods, Through Its Proprietor, Bharti Manohar Sachani Thr. His P.O.A. Karodilal A. Ahuja v. The Secretary, Government Of India, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, New Delhi And Others

1 wp3676.18+1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3676 OF 2018 (M/S. BHARTI INDUSTRIES...VS..SECRETARY, GOVT. OF INDIA & OTH.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3677 OF 2018 (M/s. BHARTI FOODS...VS..SECRETARY, GOVT. OF INDIA & OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.A.Vishwarupe, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri U.M.Aurangabadkar, ASGI for Respondent No.1. Shri S.M.Ghodeswar, A.G.P. for Respondents/State. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.

DATED : JULY 09, 2018.

1.

Prayer is to direct the respondent to decide the application preferred by the petitioner. We do not find any prejudice caused to the petitioner because of the impugned order. Arbitration proceedings are still pending and final orders are not passed. Hence, the said authority namely, Respondent No.4 has to pass appropriate orders after hearing the concerned.

2.

In this situation, without observing anything more, we dispose of the petition. No costs.

(Z.A.Haq, J) (B.P.Dharmadhikari,J) RRaut..