← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4440/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Rajkumar S/O Sitaram Kanekar v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Social Justice And Spec. Assistance Dept., Mumbai And Oth

2016-09-19Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain2 pages

WP4440-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4440/2015 (RAJKUMAR SITARAM KANEKAR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri G.K. Bhusari, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.S. Tembhare, A.G.P. for the R-1.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 19 , 2016.

Shri Bhusari, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has joined at Bhandara and since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition. It is stated that the pursis stating the aforesaid facts is filed in this Court on 02.09.2016.

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE

WP4440-15 CERTIFICATE I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.

Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte.

Uploaded on :20.09.2016.