← Library
Bombay High CourtFCA/4/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Ramesh S/O Ghanshyam Kolhe v. Revati @ Vandana D/O Gangadhar Wath

2016-04-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

FCA4-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 4/2016 (RAMESH GHANSHYAM KOLHE VERSUS REVATI @ VANDANA GANGADHAR WATH) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the appellant.

Shri Ashish Bhide, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 5 , 2016.

This Court had directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rupees Ten Thousand provisionally with a view to take care of the expenditure of the respondent in this appeal within a period of two weeks. The appellant has not deposited the said amount in this Court as could be noticed from the Office Note dated 18.03.2016. An application for extension of time to deposit the amount is not filed by the appellant. None appeared for the appellant on the last date of hearing. None appears for the appellant, today also. The Family Court Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE