Bombay High CourtCAW/1426/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Smt. Kanchan Vishwanath Jagtap v. Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur Through Its Registrar And Others

2015-07-22Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 2034/2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1925/2014.

Smt. Kanchan Vishwanath Jagtap -VERSUSMaharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur and others. Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri M.M. Sudame, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A.M. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3. Shri S.P. Palshikar, Advocate for Applicant - Intervenor. Shri P.S. Wathore, Advocate for Applicant. (C.A.No.1418/15 & 1426/15) Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for Respondent No.16.

CORAM

: SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : JULY 22, 2015.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant - intervenor.

We find that some observations are made by the Tribunal in favour of the applicant - intervenor and since the said order is challenged in the instant Writ Petition, we permit the applicant - intervenor to intervene in this Writ Petition.

Civil Application stands disposed of

accordingly.

.............

WRIT PETITION No. 1925/2014.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

Stay is operating in favour of the petitioner since 17.04.2014. The respondent nos. 10, 11 to 14 are not served till date. At the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, service upon unserved respondents by Speed post is permitted. The notice by speed post is made returnable on 05.08.2015.

It is brought to the notice of this court that the petitioner had applied for the post of Deputy Director (Open, Female) and the petitioner claims to be working on the said post in pursuance of the appointment order. Hence, petitioner should not be disturbed till further orders. The ad-interim relief granted on 17.04.2014, is modified to the aforesaid extent.

...............

Civil Application (W) Nos. 1418 & 1426 of 2015 &

537 of 2015.

In view of the modification of the ad interim relief, the cause for filing the intervention application does not survive. The application for intervention and vacation of interim relief are disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.