Bombay High CourtWP/2646/2002dispossed offdismiss for default

The Chairman Railway Rectuitment Board And ANR. v. Sandeep Pandurang Buche

2017-05-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 wp2646.02

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2646/2002 The Chairman Railway Recruitment Board and another ..Vs..

Mr. Sandeep S/o Pandurang Buche - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ JJ.

DATED : 31.05.2017.

Nobody for parties.

Central Administrative Tribunal Bench at Nagpur has vide its order dated 18th September, 2001 in O.A. No.2121/2000 directed present petitioners to consider applicant for interview on the basis of test which he had cleared and to select him if he is found fit. His grievance was he applied for the post of Train Assistant Driver (Diesel and Electrical) in pursuance of recruitment notice No.1/97. He appeared in written test and then was called for psychology test on 18.12.1999. There he was told that he was not eligible as he was not qualified.

The Recruitment Board has filed present petition on 17.8.2002 and this Court issued Rule on same day and granted ad interim order thereby above direction issued by the Central Administrative Tribunal came to be

2 wp2646.02 stayed.

Matter was then listed on 28.1.2003 when Civil Application No.7122/2002 moved for vacation of that direction was dismissed in default. On that day, nobody appeared for respondent.

Thus, after 1999 when exercise of recruitment was undertaken period of about 18 years has expired. In this situation, we find that challenge has become academic and is rendered infructuous. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.