Bombay High CourtCP/161/2014disposedoff

Maroti Rajeram Mankar v. Shri Rupendra Singh Director, Ground Water Survey And Development Agency, Pune And 3 Others

2018-06-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 cp161.2014+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 161/2014 (Shri Maroti Rajeram Mankar vs. Shri Rupendra Singh & ors.) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 160/2014 (Chandkhan Ibrahimkhan Pathan Thru LR's Mumtaj Begum vs. Shri Rupendra Singh & ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.Y. Deopujari, GP for the respondent nos. 1,3 and 4 CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.

DATED : 29 /06/2018 1] As Advocate Thengre is appearing for petitioners, Advocate Ghate is discharged.

2] Learned GP submits that orders have been complied with. Advocate Thengre does not dispute this. He states that he has instructions to withdraw both matters. 3] We have looked into the controversy. As we do not see any deliberate disobedience or delay, we dispose of contempt petitions. No costs.

4] Pending CA is also disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE Ansari