Bombay High CourtWP/4498/2013dispossed offdismiss for default

Vanwasi Vikas Pratishthan, Mumbai, Thr. Its Secretary Shri Arun S Lokhande And Another v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mumbai And 2 Others

2015-04-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre2 pages

wp4498.13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR

BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 4498 of 2013 (Vanwasi Vikas Pratishthan, Mumbai through its Secretary Shri Arun S. Lokhande and anr. Vs. State of Mah. through its Secretary, Dept. of Higher Education and ors.) ......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ......................................................................................................................................... Shri R. Dhore, Advocate for petitioners Shri R. S. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent no. 3 Mrs. Bharati Dangre, GP for respondent nos. 1 & 2

CORAM

: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & S. B. SHUKRE, JJ.

DATE : 28-4-2015.

Communication dated 9-1-2015 which contains decision reached by respondent no. 2, Joint Director of Education in adherence to judgment of this Court dated 12-12-2013 in Writ Petition No. 5265/2012 is produced on record by the learned Government Pleader. It is marked as Exhibit 'X'.

In view of this development, Shri Dhore, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that petitioners as also respondent no. 3, employee may be required to challenge this communication. He points out that this Court has protected the management in the matter by passing interim order on 12-12-2014. He seeks .....2/-

wp4498.13 continuation of that order for period of six weeks.

Learned Government Pleader is opposing grant of any interim protection.

However, considering the fact that management has already protected and interim order is still operating, we continue this order till 15-6-2015.

The petitioners as also respondent no. 3 are at liberty to file appropriate petition challenging the communication at Exhibit 'X'. With these directions and liberty, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE wasnik ...../-